Earning certification by building accessibility into ebook production

Colleges preparing for ADA Title II wanted evidence that publishers' ebooks were accessible by default. I led Norton through Benetech's Global Certified Accessible certification, from a 47% first-round score to 88%. The lasting result wasn't the badge: the audit findings became production standards, tooling, vendor requirements and training, so accessibility is built into ebooks from the start.

Problem
Norton had product VPATs, but no independent evidence that its ebook production process made accessible ebooks by default.
My role
Accessibility Program Manager
Result
Certified, with the score rising from 47% to 88%, and accessibility requirements built into the standard ebook workflow.
Status
Certified in April 2026. Benetech reviews a representative ebook each year for recertification.
Organization
W.W. Norton & Company
Team
Digital Production, Publishing Tools, Communications, Legal, and Benetech
Type
Program delivery
Areas
Accessibility, Technical program leadership

Outcomes

Problem and constraints

Colleges and schools preparing for the ADA Title II deadline were scrutinizing publishers’ accessibility claims. Norton had VPATs for its digital products, but VPATs describe one product at one point in time. There was no independent evidence that Norton’s ebooks were accessible by default, across the list, season after season.

Benetech’s Global Certified Accessible (GCA) program certifies exactly that: a publisher’s process for producing accessible EPUB ebooks, not a single title.

I initiated the relationship with Benetech, negotiated the agreement, served as Norton’s primary contact for certification, coordinated the work with Digital Production and Publishing Tools, and led the announcement. Digital Production owned the content remediation.

The first-round audit gave Norton a Born Accessible score of 47%, against an 80% threshold. The score combines automated testing with DAISY Ace and a manual evaluation with DAISY’s SMART tool, scored against the GCA criteria. The gap wasn’t one problem but six, spread across the production process: non-text content, structure, color contrast, link purpose, language of parts, and metadata.

Decisions and implementation

  1. Made the case to leadership for process-level certification alongside product VPATs.
  2. Negotiated the agreement with Benetech, including legal redlines.
  3. Coordinated remediation and re-audits with Digital Production and Publishing Tools, organized around the six areas the first round found.
  4. Turned the findings into production standards, tooling, vendor requirements and training, so they applied to every future ebook, not just the samples.
  5. Drafted and ran the announcement, from Benetech review to legal approval and release.
  6. Built the certification into Norton’s accessibility website and its sales and marketing materials.

Making the case

The argument I made in 2023 had two parts. Certification covers the production process, while VPATs cover individual products, so the two answer different questions for buyers. And the audit itself would improve Norton’s workflows, whatever the score. That second point mattered: it framed certification as a way to fix the process, not only as a credential.

Iterating with Benetech

The first-round result was the most useful thing in the project. It turned “make our ebooks accessible” into six named categories of fixes, each one something Digital Production could own.

From there it was an iterative, conversational process with Benetech: three rounds, one for each sample title, each with two to five iterations. Later rounds needed fewer iterations, which suggested the workflow changes were carrying over from one title to the next. The same kinds of issues kept needing remediation: headings, lists, tables, figures and ARIA labels. That repetition was the signal. A problem that recurs from book to book isn’t a book problem; it’s a workflow problem.

From fixes to production standards

The changes went into the workflow itself:

Launching it carefully

I drafted the press release and coordinated review by Benetech, feedback from Communications, quotes from leadership, legal approval and release logistics, and recommended media outlets for each stakeholder group. On Benetech’s guidance, the release positioned Norton as part of a community of certified publishers rather than claiming to lead it alone. I was also the press contact, and my quote in the release was about what the process gave us:

The journey toward GCA certification was invaluable, with Benetech validating the progress we’ve made and offering expert mentorship as we refined our practices and processes. The results of that work are now visible in the accessibility metadata of our new titles—educators can see exactly how our content supports diverse ways of reading and learning and can make more-informed decisions for their students.

— Jonathan Miller, Accessibility Program Manager, in the announcement

Results and limitations

What I would change

Plan earlier for checking every title. External certification and checking every title answer different questions. Certification tells you the process is sound; checking every title tells you where each book actually stands, and gives you a big-picture view of progress. I’d plan for both from the start, with the title-by-title checks adding to Benetech’s validation, not replacing it.

Further reading